Judge John Rooke the Associate Chief Justice of the Court of Queenâs Bench in Canada has promised to destroy the “Free Man on the Land Movement. In a newly released court decision John Rooke analyzes the movement, which he refers to as âorganized pseudolegal commercial argumentâ or OPCA litigants.
The Free Man on the Land movement consists of a growing number of people who are beginning to turn the rhetoric and legalese of the state against itself. According to the nationalistic folklore put forward by the courts, people are only ruled because they consent to being ruled, so many of these people are withdrawing their consent from the system.
As much of a great concept as this as, and as much as everyone should be encouraged to pursue this lifestyle, there is one fatal flaw in this approach that must be remembered. That flaw is that the whole system is a fraud to begin with, and the system will bend to the whims of authority regardless of what has been written into law previously. It is this flaw, that may begin to cause complications for those in Canada who have declared their Independence.
In the document released this week the Judge said that: âThese persons employ a collection of techniques and arguments promoted and sold by âgurusâ to disrupt court operations and to attempt to frustrate the legal rights of governments, corporations and individuals. The persons who advance these schemes, and particularly those who market and sell these concepts as commercial products, are parasites that must be stopped”
It it unbelievably ironic for a judge to say that an individual who claims sovereignty over themselves is a parasite, when that is the very essence of a bureaucrats existence. The judge has also accused these people of “clogging up the system” with paperwork and court dates, however, they are merely following the legal code to a tee without taking all of the deals and settlements that have been put into place to keep up with the incredible volume of cased that are coming through the system.
It is still too soon to tell how this ruling will effect legal cases for those who have claimed their independence, but due to the legal systems subjective concept of law it is highly possible that the law will be restructured to favor those in authority.
About James Smith
James is a father of four and grandfather to four cute little bugs. He and his wife Beautiful Gorgeous, of almost 30 years, have been prepping since 2003.
View all posts by James Smith →
All trademarks and copyrights belong to the respective owners.
TITLE 17 > CHAPTER 1 > Â§ 107 ...[T]he fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Prepper Podcast Radio Network and it's subsidiaries. Content is Copyright 2012 the individual authors.