By James Smith
17 October 2012
“But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. Here, as so often in this world, persistence is the first and most important requirement for success.” – Adolph Hitler
During the 1930’s and 40’s, NAZI scientists propagated the concept that Jews were “subhuman” or in the Teutonic, “untermensch”. In part, the idea was to so demonize one race of people to the point that killing them was a duty, a simple fact of life like killing a fly. Mao Tse-tung once issued an order to all Chinese to kill any pest that they see.
And Hitler was no different. By classifying Jews, Romani, gays, and the handicapped as being “inferior people”, it allowed the German people to kill them with impunity. Even after being told that to eject Jewish scientist would set back the German civilization 100 years, Hitler was quoted as saying, “Our national policies will not be revoked or modified, even for scientists. If the dismissal of Jewish scientists means the annihilation of contemporary German science, then we shall do without science for a few years.”
Gratefully, history closed the book of the Third Reich with a resounding slam and threw them into the fire to stop the poison.
But someone fished the book out of the fire, dusted it off and recasted the players.
The Third Reich is now the Green Movement, and the role of Jews and the Untermenschen are now being played by independent thinkers and adherents to true scientific integrity.
Global Warming, for those not paying attention, is sometimes called “Climate Change”, the concept that mankind is responsible for the warming of the earth which causes extreme weather events. Sometimes called “Anthromorphic Climate Change” – it all boils down to mankind and businesses are killing the earth. If you aren’t a Global Warming believer, you are a heretic. And heretics in this day and age must pay dearly.
In 2007, the blog, WKU Meterology was quoted as saying:
“For a more sinister motive, there are some who say that the Weather Channel has become more political recently in their views towards Global Warming and are subtly trying to influence the viewing public (who generally are not knowledgeable about historical climatology) into thinking that certain weather events are rare (or increasing or getting worse, etc.) when they are really not. This in turn implies that the frequency of many weather events are changing, which implies Global Warming is behind all the “weird weather” we have been having recently. In reality, even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states that “Recent analyses of changes in severe local weather (tornadoes, thunder days, lightning and hail) in a few selected regions provide no compelling evidence for widespread systematic long-term changes.”
In November of 2008, Weather Channel personality Heidi Cullen stated:
“If a meteorologist has an AMS Seal of Approval, which is used to confer legitimacy to TV meteorologists, then meteorologists have a responsibility to truly educate themselves on the science of global warming.” “Meteorologists are among the few people trained in the sciences who are permitted regular access to our living rooms. And in that sense, they owe it to their audience to distinguish between solid, peer-reviewed science and junk political controversy.” “If a meteorologist can’t speak to the fundamental science of climate change, then maybe the AMS shouldn’t give them a Seal of Approval.”
And earlier this month , the United States Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar has announced new funding of more than $10 million tax payer dollars to be awarded by Interior’s regional Climate Science Centers to “… universities or other partners for research to guide managers of parks, refuges and other resources in planning how to help species and ecosystems adapt to climate change.” And further in the article, “The 69 studies at eight climate science centers focus on how climate change will affect natural resources. For example, various projects identify how sea-level rise will affect coastal resources, how climate will affect vegetation, how these changes will affect valued species such as sage grouse, and how changes in water availability will affect both people and ecosystems—and ecosystem services such as fisheries. Several studies address the potential effects on resources of concern to Native Americans, some by using traditional ecological knowledge to advance adaptation planning”
Despite an article in the Wall Street Journal in January of this year, signed by sixteen scientists that all state the following, “There is no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to “decarbonize” the world’s economy.” By throwing money at an imaginary problem, the White House can tell Environmental constituents, “We tried to end global warming, but the other guys stopped us” – further enlarging the divide between two diverse groups of thought.
And earlier this week, a report was issued that global warming stopped 16 years ago. However, only five years ago former Vice President Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in stopping global warming. In his Magnus opus, “An Inconvenient Truth” Gore uses invalid data to produce this chart:
Nick-named the “Hockey Stick” chart as the rapid incline of temperatures would cause the ice caps to melt all over the world. Several calls for the award to be rescinded have fallen on deaf ears. The average person would probably get better results demanding that Mr. Obama’s Peace Prize be rescinded.
The major problem is not the science, but rather the demands to the unfaithful. The Catholic Church had their three inquisitions, but the gods of Global Warming demands cash. And lots of it.
And like the Church of old, you can buy yourself “Indulgences”, or the ability to sin and get away with it because the Church of Global Warming will forgive you.
Banking giants stand to win in the Carbon Exchange markets. This scheme is based upon derivatives, a mathematical nightmare that will cause the next major banking crisis. And as with anything new, you can bet your bottom dollar the fraud will be rampant. After all, you’ve just been forgiven of future sins by buying Carbon Credits!
The banks are preparing to do with carbon what they’ve done before: design and market derivatives contracts that will help client companies hedge their price risk over the long term. They’re also ready to sell carbon-related financial products to outside investors. - Bloomberg
The architect of this scheme, Blythe Masters, a JP Morgan employee who invented the carbon credit system had said that:
“…banks must be allowed to lead the way if a mandatory carbon-trading system is going to help save the planet at the lowest possible cost.
And derivatives related to carbon must be part of the mix, she says. Derivatives are securities whose value is derived from the value of an underlying commodity — in this case, CO2 and other greenhouse gases…”
So from the scientist of the wanna-be masters of the human race to the banking masters of the world, Global Warming is just a way to control others. Pay us, and you can play. But they will try to control every person on earth by way of a lie and this lie, like Hitler stated in the opening paragraph, must be told frequently, and reinforced often.
Human sheeple will do the rest by telling the lie to our children. And so propagates the control mechanisms down to the following generations.
It must stop with us. Fight this at every turn. Fight it by telling the truth. Fight it by demanding true scientific integrity.
Just fight it.